Hybrid mesh network monitoring signaling environment

ABSTRACT

Techniques are described to improve the robustness of communication of critical life safety data when broadband networks are used as uphaul networks. Monitoring systems are examples of critical monitoring appliances, but the techniques described throughout this disclosure may be applied to any type of critical monitoring appliances, such as fife-support devices, fire detectors, smoke detectors, and the like.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No.62/132,371, filed Mar. 12, 2015, and titled “HYBRID MESH NETWORKMONITORING SIGNALING ENVIRONMENT,” which is hereby incorporated byreference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This application generally relates to monitoring technology, and moreparticularly, signal transmissions associated with monitoringtechnology.

BACKGROUND

Monitoring systems can be designed to detect intrusions and/or thepresence of other emergency situations (e.g., fires, carbon monoxideleakage, medical emergencies, etc.) through the use of integratedsensors placed in various locations of a property. For instance,monitoring systems can include control units that detect monitoringsystem data such as sensor inputs, track arm/disarm statuses, and/orsignal instructions. The monitor control units can then transmit thedetected monitoring system data to a central monitoring station.

SUMMARY

Techniques are described for improving the reliability and versatilityof monitoring signaling by defining additional paths for monitoringsignal transmissions. Monitoring systems are typically dependent uponcommunication paths between properties where the systems are located toa central application monitoring station. These communication paths mayeither be plain ordinary telephone systems (POTS), cellular, broadband,or any combinations of these network paths. Although each of thesenetwork paths have their respective advantages and disadvantages, giventhat the communication path is critical to proper functioning of thesystem, the stability of these communication paths are a primary concernto providing security monitoring services that involve critical lifesafety data. The communication paths of existing monitoring systems arevulnerable to external circumstances such as power and internetfailures, susceptibility to invasions by intruders, and signaldisruption from extreme weather conditions.

Accordingly, techniques are described to improve the robustness ofcommunication of critical life safety data when broadband networks areused as uphaul networks. Monitoring systems are examples of criticalmonitoring appliances, but the techniques described throughout thisdisclosure may be applied to any type of critical monitoring appliances,such as life-support devices, fire detectors, smoke detectors, etc.

In some implementations, a computer-implemented method includes:receiving, by a monitoring server and through a first communicationpathway between the monitoring server and a first communication deviceassociated with a first monitoring system of a first property, one ormore data transmissions related to detection of events at the firstproperty by the first monitoring system; accessing, from electronicstorage, one or more transmission standards defined for transmission ofmonitoring system data by the first monitoring system of the firstproperty, evaluating; by the monitoring server, the first communicationpathway against the one or more transmission standards based on the oneor more data transmissions; based on the evaluation of the firstcommunication pathway against the one or more transmission standards,determining, by the monitoring server, that the first communicationpathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmissionstandards; based on the determination that the first communicationpathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmissionstandards, identifying a second communication device that is configuredto exchange data transmissions with the monitoring server through asecond communication pathway and that is configured to exchange datatransmissions with the first communication device through a peercommunication pathway, the second communication device being associatedwith a second monitoring system of a second property that is distinctfrom the first property; and reconfiguring by the monitoring server, thefirst communication device to transmit monitoring system data detectedby the first monitoring system at the first property through the peercommunication pathway to the second communication device associated withthe second monitoring system of the second property, the secondcommunication device being configured to relay monitoring system datareceived through the peer communication pathway to the monitoring serverthrough the second communication pathway.

Other versions of these and other aspects disclosed herein includecorresponding devices, systems, and computer programs encoded oncomputer-readable storage devices that are configured to perform theactions of the methods. These and other aspects may include one or moreof the features discussed below.

Implementations may include one or more optional features. For instance,in some implementations, the method may include: generating, by themonitoring server, an encryption code for the monitoring system datadetected by the first monitoring system at the first property; andtransmitting, by the monitoring server, an instruction to the firstcommunication device, to encrypt the monitoring system data detected bythe first monitoring system at the first property based on the generatedencrypted code; where the encrypted monitoring system data detected bythe first monitoring system at the first property is inaccessible to thesecond communication device associated with the second monitoring systemof the second property when the second communication device relays theencrypted monitoring system data through the second communicationpathway.

In some implementations, the method includes: receiving by themonitoring server and from the first communication device, firstmonitoring system data transmitted through the first communicationpathway; receiving, by the monitoring server and from the secondcommunication device, second monitoring system data transmitted throughthe second communication pathway; identifying by the monitoring server,a portion of first monitoring system data that includes data that issubstantially similar to a portion of the second monitoring system data;processing, by the monitoring server, the first monitoring system dataand the second monitoring system data to remove the respective portionsof the first monitoring system data and the second monitoring systemdata that include data that is substantially similar; and storing bymonitoring server, the processed first monitoring system data and theprocessed second monitoring system data.

In some implementations, the first communication device is reconfiguredto transmit monitoring system data to the second communication devicebased on a set of user-defined settings associated with the firstmonitoring system of the first property.

In some implementations, determining that the first communicationpathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmissionstandards includes at least one of determining that a cost associatedwith transmitting the monitoring system data detected by the firstmonitoring system at the first property through the first communicationpathway is greater than a threshold cost for transmission, anddetermining that a transmission latency associated with transmitting themonitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at thefirst property through the first communication pathway is greater than athreshold transmission latency.

In some implementations, identifying the second communication devicethat is configured to exchange data transmissions with the monitoringserver through the second communication pathway includes: identifying,by the monitoring system, a plurality of communication devices that areconfigured to exchange data transmissions with the monitoring serverthrough a plurality of communication pathways, the plurality ofcommunication devices being associated with a plurality of propertiesthat are predetermined to be nearby the first property and configured toexchange data transmissions with the first communication device througha plurality of peer communication pathways; evaluating each of theplurality of peer communication pathways of the plurality ofcommunication devices against the one or more transmission standardsdefined for transmission of monitoring system data by the firstmonitoring system of the first property; and selecting a particularcommunication device from among the plurality of communication devicesbased on evaluating each of the plurality of peer communication pathwaysof the plurality of communication devices against the one or moretransmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring systemdata by the first monitoring system of the first property.

In some implementations, the one or more data transmissions related todetection of events at the first property by the first monitoring systeminclude alarm data indicating detection of a critical alarm event at thefirst property.

Implementations of the described techniques may include hardware, amethod or process implemented at least partially in hardware, or acomputer-readable storage medium encoded with executable instructionsthat, when executed by a processor, perform operations.

The details of one or more implementations are set forth in theaccompanying description below. Other features will be apparent from thedescription of the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of an electronic system configured tocommunicate critical data using broadband networks as uphaul networks.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a process for establishing anddesignating a communication path for monitoring signal datatransmission.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a process for performing de-duplicationoperations of monitoring signal data.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a process for determining when touphaul monitoring signal data to an application monitoring stationduring a transmission of monitoring signal data between peercommunication devices.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a hybrid mesh network between multiplemonitor control units

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a user interface for configuringprivacy settings for a hybrid mesh network

FIG. 7 illustrates examples of user-defined network configurations andcorresponding signaling pathway configurations

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of utilizing encrypted codes forencrypting data transmissions over a hybrid mesh network

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of de-duplicating data transmissions overa hybrid mesh network

FIG. 10 illustrates an example process of reconfiguring a signalingpathway configuration for a monitor control unit.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Given the differences in communication paths from various propertiesthat all report to the same monitoring server, certain of the propertiesmay offer faster, more reliable, and/or less expensive communicationspaths for data transmission to the monitoring server. For instance, afirst property may include a broadband Internet connection, a secondproperty may include a POTS connection, a third property may include a3G cellular connection, and a fourth property may include an LTEcellular connection. All of these properties also may include peercommunication devices that are capable of forming a peer-to-peerwireless mesh network that enables exchange of wireless communicationsbetween the properties. For instance, the peer communication devices maycommunicate over a wireless connection that extends approximately thirtyfeet and enables one property to communicate with one or moreneighboring properties, but no further. In this case, the peercommunication devices coordinate to establish a peer-to-peer networkthat enable all of the properties to communicate, even though somecannot communicate directly. Communications may flow through a string ofpeer communication devices from the first property to the fourthproperty and back from the fourth property to the first property.

The properties then use the peer-to-peer network to provide data to themonitoring server in the most efficient and reliable manner as dictatedby the data to be transmitted. For example, for non-critical data, datacommunications may be passed to the first property for transmissionthrough the broadband Internet connection of the first property thatdoes not incur any additional cost in transmission. In another example,for critical alarm data, data communications may be passed to the secondproperty for transmission through the reliable POTS connection. As yetanother example, an outage or tapering activity may render wiredconnections at the first and second properties unavailable. In thisexample, data communications may be passed to the fourth property fortransmission through the cellular connection, which is faster than the3G cellular connection at the third property. Many examples are possibleand the properties connected through the peer-to-peer network may makeany appropriate decisions on how to best transmit data to the monitoringserver based on cost, speed, and/or reliability.

Given that monitoring system data may flow to properties other than theproperty that generated the data, encryption of the data andidentification of the source of the data may be needed. Accordingly, insome implementations, the system may receive one or more encryptioncodes via a direct path transmission from an application monitoringstation. The system may establish a communication path with a secondpeer communication device using the one or more encryption codes. Thesystem may perform a test to automatically verify and evaluate thecommunication path. Finally, the system may designate the peer-to-peercommunication path as the primary path for monitoring signal datatransmission.

In some implementations, the system may receive a first monitoringsignal from a primary communication device via a communication path. Thesystem may store data from the first received monitoring signal into atransmission record for a period of time. The system may receive asecond monitoring signal from a communication device via thecommunication path. The system may compare data from the second receivedsignal to data stored on the transmission record. The system may thendetermine if the data from the second received signal has been processedbased on comparing the data from the second received signal to the datastored on the transmission record. Finally, the system may perform ade-duplication operation based on determining the data from the secondreceived signal has been processed.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of an electronic system 100 configured tocommunicate critical data using broadband networks as uphaul networks.The electronic system 100 includes an application monitoring station110, a network 105, and monitoring system control units 140, 150 thatare located at and monitor different properties. In some examples, thenetwork 105 facilitates communication between the application monitoringstation 110, and the one or more monitor control units 140, 150.

The network 105 is configured to enable exchange of electroniccommunications between devices connected to the network 105. The network105 may include, for example, one or more of the Internet, Wide AreaNetworks (WANs), Local Area Networks (LANs), analog or digital wired andwireless telephone networks (e.g., a public switched telephone network(PSTN), Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN), a cellular network,and Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)), radio, television, cable, satellite,or any other delivery or tunneling mechanism for carrying data. Thenetwork 105 may include multiple networks or subnetworks, each of whichmay include, for example, a wired or wireless data pathway. The network105 may include a circuit-switched network, a packet-switched datanetwork, or any other network able to carry electronic communications(e.g., data or voice communications). For example, the network 105 mayinclude networks based on the Internet protocol (IP), asynchronoustransfer mode (ATM), the PSTN, packet-switched networks based on IP,X.25, or Frame Relay, or other comparable technologies and may supportvoice using, for example, VA′, or other comparable protocols used forvoice communications. The network 105 may include one or more networksthat include wireless data channels and wireless voice channels. Thenetwork 105 may be a wireless network, a broadband network, or acombination of networks including a wireless network and a broadbandnetwork.

The application monitoring station 110 is an electronic deviceconfigured to provide monitoring services by exchanging electroniccommunications with the one or more monitoring system control units 140,150, over the network 105. For example, the application monitoringstation 110 may be configured to monitor events (e.g., alarm events)generated by the one or more monitoring system control units 140, 150 inthis example, the application monitoring station 110 may exchangeelectronic communications with the direct path transmission devices 142and 152 included in the one or more monitoring system control units 140,150, respectively, to receive information regarding events (e.g., alarmevents) detected by the one or more monitoring system control units 140,150. The application monitoring station 110 may use the receivedinformation to store one or more encryption codes 112 and one or moretransmission records 114 associated with the one or more monitoringsystem control units 140, 150. The one or more encryption codes 112 aredevice-specific identifiers that allows the system 100 to identifytransmissions generated by the one or more monitoring system devices140, 150. The transmission record 114 includes a repository of archivedmonitoring signal data that tracks the source generating the data and/orthe communication path used to transmit the data to the applicationmonitoring station 110.

The one or more monitoring system control unit 140, 150 may beconfigured to receive input from one or more sensors or detectors 124.For example, as represented in FIG. 1, the monitoring system controlunit 140 may be configured to receive data from multiple sensors 124.The sensors 124 may include a contact sensor, a motion sensor, a glassbreak sensor, or any other type of sensor included in an alarm system ora security system. The sensors 124 may also include an environmentalsensor, such as a temperature sensor, a water sensor, a rain sensor, awind sensor, a light sensor, a smoke detector, a carbon monoxidedetector, an air quality sensor, etc. The sensors 124 further mayinclude a health monitoring sensor, such as a prescription bottle sensorthat monitors taking of prescriptions, a blood pressure sensor, a bloodsugar sensor, a bed mat configured to sense presence of liquid (e.g.,bodily fluids) on the bed mat, etc. In some examples, the sensors mayinclude a radio-frequency identification (RFID) sensor that identifies aparticular article that includes a pre-assigned RFID tag. In addition,the sensors 124 may include a video/photographic camera or other type ofoptical sensing device configured to capture images and may include anenergy consumption sensor for appliances and devices in a propertymonitored by the monitoring system.

The one or more monitoring system control units 140, 150 communicatewith modules 128 and 134 and sensors 124 to perform system monitoringand control. The module 128 is connected to one or more appliances, isconfigured to monitor activity of the one or more devices, and isconfigured to control operation of the one or more appliances. Themodule 128 may directly measure activity of the one or more appliancesor may estimate activity of the one or more appliances based on detectedusage of the one or more appliances. The module 128 may communicateenergy monitoring information to the one or more monitoring systemcontrol units 140, 150 and may control the one or more appliances basedon the commands received from the one or more monitoring system controlunits 140, 150.

The module 134 is connected to a thermostat, is configured to monitortemperature of a temperature regulation system associated with thethermostat, and is configured to control operation of the thermostat.The module 134 may directly measure activity of the temperatureregulation system associated with the thermostat or may estimateactivity of the temperature regulation system associated with thethermostat based on the detected temperature of the temperatureregulation system associated with the thermostat. The module 134 alsomay determine energy usage information based on the activity,communicate energy monitoring information to the one or more monitoringsystem control units 140, 150, and control the thermostat based oncommands received from the one or more monitoring system control units140, 150.

The modules 128, 134, and sensors 124 communicate with the monitoringsystem control unit 140 over communication links 130, 132, and 126,respectively. The communication links 130, 132, and 126 may be a wiredor wireless data pathway configured to transmit signals from the modules128, 134, and sensors 124 to the monitoring system control unit 140. Themodules 124, 128, and sensors 124 may continuously transmit sensedvalues to the one or more monitoring system control units 140, 150,periodically transmit sensed values to the one or more monitoring systemcontrol units 140, 150, or transmit sensed values to the one or moremonitoring system control units 140, 150 in response to a change in asensed value.

The one or more monitoring system control units 140, 150 include directpath transmission devices 142 and 152, respectively, and peercommunication devices 144 and 154, respectively. The direct pathtransmission devices 142 and 152 are communication devices configured toexchange communication over the network 105. The direct pathtransmission devices 142 and 152 may be wireless communication modulesconfigured to exchange wireless communications over the network 105. Forexample, the direct path transmission devices 142 and 152 may bewireless communication devices configured to exchange communicationsover a wireless data channel and a wireless voice channel. In thisexample, the direct path transmission devices 142 and 152 may transmitalarm data over a wireless data channel and establish a two-way voicecommunication session over a wireless voice channel. The wirelesscommunication device may include one or more of a LIE module, a GSMmodule, a radio modem, cellular transmission module, or any type ofmodule configured to exchange communications in one of the followingformats: LIE, GSM or GPRS, CDMA, EDGE or EGPRS, EV-DO or EVDO, UMTS, orIP.

The direct path transmission devices 142 and 152 may also may be wiredcommunication modules configured to exchange communications over thenetwork 105 using a wired connection. For instance, the direct pathtransmission devices 142 and 152 may be modems, network interface cards,or another type of network interface devices. The direct pathtransmission devices 142 and 152 may be Ethernet network cardsconfigured to enable the one or more monitoring system control units140, 150 to communicate over a local area network and/or the Internet.The direct path transmission devices 142 and 152 also may be voicebandmodems configured to enable the alarm panel to communicate over thetelephone lines of Plain Old Telephone Systems (POTS).

In some examples, the direct path transmission devices 142 and 152 mayinclude a processor or other control circuitry configured to executeinstructions of a program that controls operation of an alarm system. Inthese examples, the one or more direct path transmission devices may beconfigured to receive input from sensors, detectors, or other devicesincluded in the alarm system and control operations of devices includedin the alarm system or other household devices (e.g., a thermostat, anappliance, lights, etc.). For example, the direct path transmissiondevices 142 and 152 may be configured to control operation of the peercommunication devices 144 and 154 included in the one or more monitoringsystem control units 140, 150.

The peer communication devices 144 and 154 are communication devicesconfigured to exchange communications between similar devices in apeer-to-peer manner. In some instances, the peer communications devices144 and 154 may exchange data between the one or more monitoring systemcontrol units 140, 150 using a peer-to-peer communication path 160. Forinstance, the peer communication devices 144 and 154 may communicateusing various local wireless protocols such as wifi, Bluetooth, zwave,zigbee, or wired protocols such as Ethernet and USB, to connect the oneor more monitoring system control units 140, 150 to each other and othermonitoring system control units. The local connection may improve thespeed of status and control communications because communicating throughthe network 105 with a remote server (e.g., the application monitoringstation 110) may be significantly slower.

In some implementations, the one or more monitoring system control units140, 150 may be configured to communicate with external peercommunication devices 138 nearby the property to enable or amplifysignal transmission between the peer communication devices 144 and 154.For example, the external communication devices 138 may be communicationrelay devices placed nearby a housing unit (e.g., backyard) and maintaincontinuous communications between the one or more monitoring systemunits 140, 150 located within the property. In such examples, theexternal peer communication devices 138 may function either as a signalaggregator for the peer communication devices 144 and 154 for signaltransmission over the peer-to-peer communication path 160, or a backuptransmitting device that is enabled when the peer communication devices144 and 154 within the property are unavailable to transmit signal data.

The peer communication devices 144 and 154 receive the one or moreencryption codes 112 from the application monitoring station 110 throughthe direct path devices 142 and 152, respectively over the network 105.The one or more encryption codes 112 may allow transmission between peercommunication devices 144 and 154 over the peer-to-peer communicationpath 160 by identifying and verifying the one or more monitoring systemcontrol units 140, 150, In some instances, the peer-to-peercommunication path 160 is tested and evaluated for a period of timebefore the peer-to-peer communication path 160 is designated a primaryor acceptable communication path for the one or more monitoring systemcontrol units 140, 150. In such instances, the peer-to-peercommunication path 160 may replace the existing data communicationpathway between the one or more monitoring system control units 140, 150and the application monitoring station 110 over network 105 fortransmitting monitoring signal data.

In some implementations, the peer-to-peer communication path 160 is usedas a redundant communication pathway to the primary path between the oneor more monitoring system control units 140, 150 and the applicationmonitoring station 110 over the network 105. For instance, the one ormore monitoring system control unit 140, 150 may transmit monitoringsignal data through the direct path transmission devices 142 and 152,respectively, as well as the communication path 160. In such instances,monitoring signal data received by the application monitoring station110, may be de-duplicated to prevent duplicate processing and analysisof identical monitoring signal data. Monitoring signal data transmittedto the application monitoring station 110 may be de-duplicated bycomparing all received monitoring signal data from the direct pathtransmission devices 142 and 152, and the peer-to-peer communicationpath 160 to the transmission record 114. When duplicate monitoringsignal data is received by the application monitoring station 110, thesystem 100 compares the received data to transmission record 114 and thereceived data is ignored.

In some examples, the peer-to-peer communication path 160 is a meshnetwork of peer devices that are capable of communicating with oneanother over a wireless protocol, such as a short-range wirelessprotocol. The peer devices may or may not be able to uphaul data to theapplication monitoring station 110. For instance, the peer communicationdevices 144, 154 may be able to uphaul data, but the external peercommunication devices 138 may not be able to uphaul data and, instead,merely route data between peer devices in control units, such as thepeer communication devices 144, 154. In this regard, the external peercommunication devices 138 operate to pass monitoring system data betweencontrol units in other properties in an effort to identify the most costeffective manner of uphauling the data to the application monitoringstation 110. For example, the monitoring system control unit 140 may beonly able to uphaul data over a cellular connection, whereas themonitoring system control unit 150 may be able to uphaul data over abroadband Internet connection. In this example, at least for lesscritical data, the monitoring system control unit 140 takes advantage ofthe less expensive broadband Internet connection of the monitoringsystem control unit 150 and sends monitoring system data over thepeer-to-peer communication path 160 to the monitoring system controlunit 150 for transmission in a less costly manner. In addition, at leastsome of the external peer communication devices 138 may be able touphaul data to the application monitoring station 110 (e.g., over acellular connection) in the event a less costly or sufficientlyefficient path is unavailable or not found on the peer-to-peercommunication path 160.

In some implementations, a latency governor 170 may be used with the oneor more monitoring system control units 140, 150 to modulate thecommunication between the one or more monitoring system control units140, 150 over the communication path 160. In some instances, the latencygovernor 170 may be an automated computer-implemented protocol thatmonitors the latency of the monitoring signal data transmission betweenthe peer communication devices 144 and 154 of the one or more monitoringsystem control units 140, 150 after the generation of an alarm eventwithin the properties where the one or more monitoring system controlunits 140, 150 are located. For example, the latency governor 170 mayenable or disable the peer-to-peer communication path 160 based oncomparing the monitoring signal data latency to a threshold value.

In some implementations, the latency governor 170 may be an automatedcomputer-implemented protocol within the application monitoring station110 that terminates an existing peer-to-peer communication path 160between one or more monitoring system control units 140, 150 andestablishes a different communication path to lower the latency ofmonitoring signal data transmission to the application monitoringstation 110. In addition, the latency governor 170 also may modulate theconnection between the one or more monitoring system control units 140,150 and the application monitoring station 110 to optimize the datatransmission of monitoring signal data generated by the one or moremonitoring system control units 140, 150. In such instances, theconfiguration settings of the latency governor 170 may be based on thedata transmission to from the peer communication devices 144 and 154.

In some implementations, the latency governor 170 may be a controllerthat includes hardware configurations for the application monitoringstation 110 that controls monitoring signal data transmission via thedirect path transmission devices 142 and 152 of the one or moremonitoring system control units 140, 150, respectively. For instance,the latency governor 170 may determine that the latency of themonitoring signal data transmission from the one or monitoring systemcontrol units 140, 150 is above a threshold value. In such an instance,the application monitoring station 110 may disable data transmissionbetween peer communication devices 144 and 154 over peer-to-peercommunication path 160, and enable monitoring signal data transmissionto the application monitoring station 110 via the direct pathtransmission devices 142 and 152 over the network 105.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart for establishing and designating a communicationpath for monitoring signal data transmission. The operations of theexample process 200 are described generally as being performed by thesystem 100. The operations of the example process 200 may be performedby one of the components of the system 100 (e.g., the applicationmonitoring station 110, the one or more monitoring system control units140, 150, etc.) or may be performed by any combination of the componentsof the system 100. In some implementations, operations of the exampleprocess 200 may be performed by one or more processors included in oneor more electronic devices.

Briefly, the system 100 receives one or more encryption codes via adirect path transmission from an application monitoring station (210).The system 100 establishes a peer-to-peer communication path with asecond peer communication device using the one or more encryption codesvia a peer-to-peer communication path (220). The system 100 performs atest to automatically verify and evaluate the peer-to-peer communicationpath (230). The system 100 designates the peer-to-peer communicationpath as the primary path for monitoring signal transmission (240).

The example process 200 begins when the system 100 receives one or moreencryption codes via a direct path transmission from an applicationmonitoring station (210). In some instances, an encryption code isassociated with an alarm system connected to the application monitoringstation. For example, the system 100 may use unique encryption codes forthe one or more monitoring system control units 140, 150 and transmitthem to the application monitoring station 110, where they may be storedas one or more encryption codes 112. The one or more encryption codes112 may be transmitted to the application monitoring station 110 via thedirect path transmission devices 142 and 152 over network 105 and/orcommunicated from the application monitoring station 110 to the directpath transmission devices 142 and 152 over network 105.

The system 100 establishes a peer-to-peer communication path with asecond peer communication device within using the one or more encryptioncodes (220). For example, the communication path may be the peer-to-peercommunication path 160 between the one or more monitoring system controlunits 140, 150 between the peer communication devices 144 and 154. Insuch examples, the peer-to-peer communication path 160 may be wirelessor wired connection protocols that allow the one or more monitoringsystem control units 140, 150 to exchange monitoring signal data betweenthe peer communication devices 144 and 154, respectively. The system 100may establish the communication path 160 between the specific devices byusing the one or more encryption codes 112 associated with the one ormore monitoring system control units 140, 150 to create a bridge betweenthe peer communication devices 144 and 154.

The system 100 performs a test to automatically verify and evaluate thepeer-to-peer communication path (230). For example, the system 100 mayperform a transmission verification test by transmitting a preliminarysignal between the one or more monitoring system control units 140, 150over the peer-to-peer communication path 160. In such an example, thesystem 100 may measure performance parameters, such as signal latency,transfer rates, or network integrity, while conducting tests such asdata hash comparisons and cyclic redundancy checks to determine thespeed, accuracy and efficiency of the data transmission over thepeer-to-peer communication path 160. In addition, the system 100 maycompare the characteristics of the transmitted monitoring signal data tothe original monitoring signal data generated at the property where theone or more monitoring system control units 140, 150 may be located todetermine the data retention during the transmission between peercommunication devices 144 and 154.

In some examples, the system 100 may test the reliability of the networkconnections between the direct path transmission devices 142 and 152 andthe application monitoring station 110 over network 105. In suchexamples, the system 100 may conduct network infrastructure monitoringdiagnostics, analysis, and performance management across the network 105to optimize the connections with the direct path transmission devices142 and 152 based on the hardware configurations of the one or moremonitoring system control units 140, 150.

The system 100 designates the peer-to-peer communication path as aprimary path for monitoring signal transmission (240). For example,based on testing of the peer-to-peer communication path 160, the system100 may limit alternative communication pathways for the monitoringsignal data from the one or more monitoring system control units 140,150 over the network 105. In such examples, the system 100 may comparethe transmission performance between the peer-to-peer communication path160 to alternative communication pathways to designate the primary pathfor monitoring signal data.

In some implementations, the system 100 may utilize the applicationmonitoring station 110 as a backend controller to designatecommunication pathways for monitoring signal data between the one ormore monitoring system control units. In some instances, the applicationmonitoring station 110 may temporarily disable transmission ofmonitoring signal data from the direct path transmission devices 142 and152 to allow transmission via the peer communication pathway 160. Insuch instances, the application monitoring station 110 monitors themultiple communication pathways formed between one or more monitoringsystem control units 140, 150 and designates a primary path based onconducting tests on each pathway to determine the most efficientcommunication pathway.

In some implementations, the system 100 may utilize the multiplecommunication pathways as a redundant transmission mechanism to theprimary communication pathway. In some instances, the system 100 may usethe primary path to transmit critical life-safety monitoring signal dataand use the alternative communication pathways to transmit othermonitoring signal data identified as non-crucial. For example, theapplication monitoring station 110 may initially monitor the generatedmonitoring signal data in the one or more monitoring system controlunits 140, 150 and assign different categories for the monitoring signaldata based its severity within the transmission record 114. The system100 may subsequently transmit the categorized monitoring signal dataacross the relevant communication pathway based on the need for a fasttransmission. In such examples, the life-critical monitoring signal datamay be transmitted through the primary pathway, whereas the non-criticalmonitoring signal data may be transmitted through alternative pathways.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example process 300 for performing de-duplicationoperations of monitoring signal data. The operations of the exampleprocess 300 may be performed by one of the components of the system 100(e.g., the application monitoring station 110, the one or moremonitoring system control units 140, 150, etc.) or may be performed byany combination of the components of the system 100. In someimplementations, operations of the example process 300 may be performedby one or more processors included in one or more electronic devices.

Briefly, the system 100 receives a first monitoring signal from aprimary communication device via a primary communication path (310) Thesystem 100 stores data from the first received monitoring signal into atransmission record for a period of time (320). The system 100 receivesa second monitoring signal from a secondary communication device via thecommunication path (330). The system 100 compares data from the secondreceived signal to data stored on the transmission record (340). Thesystem 100 determines if the data from the second received signal hasbeen processed based on comparing the data from the second receivedsignal to the data stored on the transmission record (350). The system100 performs a de-duplication operation based on determining the datafrom the second received signal has been processed (360).

The process 300 begins when system 100 receives a first monitoringsignal from a primary communication device via a primary communicationpath (310). For example, the primary communication device may be one ormore monitoring system control units 140, 150. In such examples, themonitoring signal data may be received by the application monitoringstation 110 over the network 105. In addition, the primary communicationpath may include a network pathway between the application monitoringstation 110 and the direct path transmission devices 142 and 152 overnetwork 105.

The system 100 stores data from the first received monitoring signalinto a transmission record for a period of time (320). For example, theapplication monitoring station 110 may store the received monitoringsignal data from the one or more monitoring system control units 140,150 into the transmission record 114. In this example, the transmissionrecord 114 may include characteristics of the monitoring signal data,such as information from sensors, detectors, or other devices includedin the alarm system and control operation of the devices included in thealarm system or other household devices (e.g., a thermostat, anappliance, lights, etc.). The transmission record 114 also may includeinformation on the alarm event generating the monitoring signal data todetermine whether the monitoring signal data contains life-criticalinformation. For instances, if the transmitted monitoring signal data isgenerated from fire detector sensors, the system 100 may identify thedata as life-critical within the transmission record 114.

The system 100 receives a second monitoring signal from a secondarycommunication device via a secondary communication path (330). In someinstances, the application monitoring station 110 may receive multipletransmissions from several communication paths originating from the sameone or more monitoring system control units 140, 1:50, For example, theapplication monitoring station 110 may receive a first monitoring signaldata transmission from the monitoring system control unit 140 directlyfrom the direct path transmission device 142 over network 105. Theapplication monitoring station 110 may subsequently receive a secondmonitoring signal data transmission from the monitoring system controlunit 150 from the direct path transmission device 152. In this example,the prim communication path may be the path between the direct pathtransmission device 142 over network 105 and the secondary communicationdevice may be the monitoring system control unit 150 that received datafrom the monitoring system control unit 140 over the peer-to-peercommunication path 160.

In some implementations, the application monitoring station 110 mayreceive redundant monitoring signal data from monitoring system controlunit 140 via multiple communication pathways. For example, the firstmonitoring signal data transmission may be transmitted by a primarycommunication pathway that corresponds to the pathway formed between thedirect path transmission device 142 and the application monitoringstation 110 over network 105. The second monitoring signal transmissionmay be transmitted by a second communication pathway that corresponds tothe pathway formed between a combination of the peer communicationdevice 144 and the peer communication device 154 via peer-to-peercommunication path 160, and the pathway formed between the direct pathtransmission device 152 and the application monitoring station 110 overnetwork 105. In such examples, the monitoring signal data generated bythe monitoring system control unit 140 may be segmented amongstdifferent communication pathways to improve transmission efficiency andprocessed by the application monitoring station 110 once it has receivedall segments of the monitoring signal data.

In some examples, the monitoring signal data transmitted throughmultiple communication pathways from the same communication device maybe redundantly transmitted based on the importance of the monitoringsignal data to the user. For example, monitoring signal data thatcontains life-safety data may be transmitted through the primarycommunication pathway, whereas the non-critical monitoring signal datamay be transmitted through the secondary communication pathway toprioritize the transmission of life-critical monitoring signal data bymaximizing its transmission efficiency.

The system 100 compares data from the second received signal to datastored on the transmission record (340). For example, the applicationmonitoring station 110 may compare a received monitoring signal from theone or more monitoring system control units 140, 150 to determine if itis a duplicate transmission that has been previously received by theapplication monitoring station 110 and is stored within the transmissionrecord 114. The application monitoring station 110 may comparecharacteristics of the monitoring signal data transmission such as theproperty information for the alarm system that generated the monitoringsignal, the alarm event that corresponds to the signal, as well as dataparameters included within the transmission such as hash identifiers fortransmission instance, or activity logs generated by the direct pathtransmission devices 142 and 152 or the peer communication devices 144and 154, upon transmission of the received monitoring signal datatransmission.

In some implementations, the application monitoring station 110 may onlycompare the data received for a certain time period (e.g., two to threeminutes) to ensure its relevance to the existing received monitoringsignal data within the transmission record 114. For example, theapplication monitoring station 110 may initially determine whether tworeceived monitoring signal data transmissions were received below aspecified time period to exclude the possibility that they may be twoseparate monitoring signal data transmissions from the samecommunication device. In such examples, the application monitoringstation 110 may perform this preliminary comparison to conserveprocessing power required to perform subsequent comparisons to determinewhether two received monitoring signal data transmissions are duplicatetransmissions.

The system 100 determines if the data from the second received signalhas been processed based on comparing the data from the second receivedsignal to the data stored on the transmission record (350). Forinstance, the application monitoring station 110 may parse thetransmission record 114 to determine whether any prior receivedmonitoring signal data transmissions within a certain time period (e.g.,two to three minutes) match the received monitoring signal datatransmission. The application monitoring station 110 may determine thatthe data from the second monitoring signal data transmission has beenpreviously processed if this comparison indicates that the alarm eventrepresented in the monitoring signal data transmission is alreadyrepresented within the transmission record 114.

In some implementations, the application monitoring station 110 mayperform subsequent comparisons to determine whether the receivedmonitoring signal data transmission contains supplementary informationto an existing monitoring signal data transmission previously receivedand stored within the transmission record. For example, if a propertygenerates an alarm event when incomplete information of its cause isavailable to the system 100, the first monitoring signal datatransmission may include preliminary monitoring signal data that isstored within the transmission record 114. A subsequent secondmonitoring signal data transmission may be submitted once the system 100has received more relevant information from service providers. In suchexamples, the second monitoring signal data transmission would beidentified by the application monitoring station 110 as a relatedtransmission of the same alarm event although the data from the secondmonitoring signal data transmission is already represented within thetransmission record 114. In such examples, application monitoringstation 110 may expedite the processing and storing operations of thesecond monitoring signal data transmission as it is related to anexisting entry within the transmission record 114.

The system 100 performs a de-duplication operation based on determiningthe data from the second received signal has been processed (360). Forinstance, the application monitoring station 110 may create a temporaryarchive in memory to store monitoring signal data transmissions that thesystem 100 has identified as duplicate data transmissions. In suchinstances, the application monitoring station 110 may create a dedicatedcache for such duplicate transmissions until the correspondingmonitoring signal data transmission in the transmission record 114 hasbeen transmitted to the appropriate resource and is removed from thetransmission record. In some instances, the application monitoringstation 110 may only store life-critical duplicate monitoring signaldata transmissions in memory to conserve resources for other processes.

In some implementations, the de-duplication operation may includedeleting the duplicate alarm-signal data transmission to reduce thelikelihood of data redundancy within the transmission record 114, Forexample, the application monitoring station 110 may ignore the secondmonitoring signal data transmission and not carry out any processing orstoring steps.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example process 400 for determining when to uphaulthe monitoring signal data to an application monitoring station during atransmission of monitoring signal data between peer communicationdevices. The process 400 determines when to uphaul monitoring signaldata based on whether a partner direct transmission device is connectedto a reliable network and if the data uphaul has sufficient allocationand is cost-effective to the system.

The process 400 begins with the system 100 transmitting monitoringsignal data to a first peer communication device via a first peercommunication path (410). For example, the first peer communicationdevice may be the monitoring system control unit 140 and thecommunication path may be between the direct path transmission device140 and the application monitoring station 110 over network 105. Thesystem 100 may determine whether a partner direct transmission device isconnected to a reliable network (412). For example, the system 100 mayanalyze the connection of the direct path transmission device 142 to thenetwork 105. The system 100 also may determine if data uphaul hassufficient allocation and is cost effective (414). For example, if thenetwork connection of the direct path transmission device 142 has a lowbandwidth or connection speed compared to the size of the monitoringsignal data, the system 100 may determine that data uphaul maysignificantly reduce transmission efficiency. If the partner directtransmission device is connected to a reliable network and the datauphaul has sufficient allocation and is cost-effective, the system 100uphauls the monitoring signal data to an application monitoring station(440), where the process 400 then ends.

If the system 100 determines that the partner direct transmission deviceis not connected to a reliable network, that there is insufficientallocation for the data uphaul, or that the data uphaul is too costly,the system 100 transmits the monitoring signal data to a second peerconnection device via a second peer communication path (420). Forexample, the second peer connection device may be the monitoring systemcontrol unit 150 and the second peer communication path may be thepeer-to-peer communication path 160. The system 100 may determinewhether a partner direct transmission device is connected to a reliablenetwork (422). For example, the system 100 may analyze the connection ofthe direct path transmission device 152 to the network 105. The system100 also may determine if data uphaul has sufficient allocation and iscost effective (424). For example, if the network connection of thedirect path transmission device 152 has a low bandwidth or connectionspeed compared to the size of the monitoring signal data, the system 100may determine that data uphaul may significantly reduce transmissionefficiency. If the partner direct transmission device is connected to areliable network and the data uphaul has sufficient allocation and iscost-effective, the system 100 uphauls the monitoring signal data to anapplication monitoring station (440), where the process 400 then ends.

If the system 100 determines that the partner direct transmission deviceis not connected to a reliable network, that there is insufficientallocation for the data uphaul, or the data uphaul is too costly, thesystem 100 may determine if the signal latency is greater than athreshold value (426). For example, the latency of the data transmissionmay be monitored by a latency governor 170, which compares the currenttransmission latency to a threshold value. If the determined signallatency is higher than the threshold value, the system 100 uphauls themonitoring signal data to an application monitoring station (440), wherethe process 400 then ends.

If the determined signal latency is lower than the threshold value, thesystem 100 then transmits the monitoring signal data to a third peerconnection device via a third peer communication path (430). The system100 then uphauls the monitoring signal data to an application monitoringstation (440), where the process 400 then ends.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a hybrid mesh network 500 between theapplication monitoring station 110 and multiple monitor control units510, 520, and 530 over the network 105. As depicted, the hybrid meshnetwork 500 may include direct communication pathways 502A, 502B, 502Cand peer communication pathways 504A, 504B, and 504C. In someimplementations, the monitoring control units 510, 520, and 530correspond to the monitoring control unit 140 as described previouslywith respect to FIG. 1.

Each of the multiple monitor control units 510, 520, and 530 may havedifferent network attributes associated with the respective directcommunication pathways and peer communication pathways. For example, themonitor control unit 510 may be configured to a local network that has alower bandwidth and transmission speed compared to that of the monitorcontrol units 520 and 530. In this regard, each of the directcommunication pathways 502A, 502B, 502C, and each of the peercommunication pathways 504A, 504B, and 504C may have different networkattributes that impact transmission of monitoring system data (e.g.,alarm event data) over the respective pathways.

As described previously, the application monitoring station 110 iscapable of reconfiguring each of the monitoring control units 510, 520,and 530 to either maximize the cost-effectiveness, or reduce thetransmission latency, of the transmission pathway between theapplication monitoring station 110 and a particular monitoring controlunit. For instance, the application monitoring station 110 can comparethe network attributes of the monitor control units 510, 520, and 530 toone or more standards associated with the transmission of the monitoringstation data. The transmission standards can include a maximum latencyfor transmission, a maximum cost associated with transmission, anencryption standard for the transmission, and/or a combination of theabove.

In reconfiguring each of the monitoring control units 510, 520, and 530,the application monitoring station 110 transmits configurationinstructions to update the transmission pathway such that the updatedtransmission pathway satisfies the transmissions standards fortransmission monitoring system data over the updated transmissionpathway. For example, in response to determining that an initialtransmission pathway for the monitoring control unit 510 including thedirect transmission pathway 502A does not satisfy transmissionstandards, the application monitoring station 110 reconfigures themonitor control unit 510 to transmit monitoring station data over anupdated transmission pathway. In this example, the updated transmissionpathway can either include the peer communication pathway 504A and thedirect communication pathway 502B through the monitor control unit 520,or the peer communication pathway 504C and the direct communicationpathway 502C through the monitor control unit 530.

The network attributes of the updated transmission pathway can becompared against the initial transmission pathway in order to determinewhether a reconfiguration would be beneficial to data transmission bythe monitor control unit 510. In addition, alternatives of the updatedtransmission pathways (e.g., through the monitor control unit 520, orthe monitor control unit 530) can also be evaluated by the applicationmonitoring station 110 to determine the most applicable updatedtransmission pathway.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a user interface 600 for configuringprivacy settings for a hybrid mesh network. The interface 600 can beprovided on a display on the monitor control unit 140, or on userdevices that are configured to exchange communications with the monitorcontrol unit 140 over the network 105. For example, the interface 600can be presented either as a webpage used by the user to adjustconfiguration settings for the system 100, or on a mobile applicationinstalled on the user device that receives information from theapplication monitoring station 110. In some instances, the mobileapplication may be provided by a third-party organization that providesmonitoring services associated with the system 100.

As depicted, the interface 600 includes privacy features 612, 614, and614, which enable the user of a property where the system 100 is locatedto control data transmissions to and from the monitor control unit, orcontrol how the application monitoring station 110 processes updates tothe hybrid mesh network 500 to reconfigure the transmission pathways ofthe monitor control unit, or the monitor control units or nearbyproperties. For example, privacy feature 612 allows a user to specifywhether outgoing monitoring system data of the monitor control unit 140can be transmitted to other monitor control units of neighboringproperties (e.g., the monitor control unit 150) using over a peercommunication pathway. A user may disable this feature if he/she isconcerned about potential data breaches over the peer communicationpathways, which could potentially enable other users to access sensitivedata or information of the property where the monitor control unit 140is located.

The privacy feature 614 allows a user to specify a transmission overridefor emergency monitor system data (e.g., life critical data, alarm data,tire safety data, etc.). For instance, if enabled, the monitor controlunit 140 is configured to transmit monitoring system data over the peercommunication pathway of the hybrid mesh network only in circumstanceswhere the data is determined to indicate an emergency situation at ornear the property where the monitor control unit 140 is located.

The privacy feature 616 allows a user to specify a minimum encryptionlevel required to transmit monitoring system data over the peercommunication pathways of monitor control units of nearby properties.For example, as depicted, a user can specify a level from “1” to “5,”where “1” indicates a minimum encryption level and “5” indicates amaximum level, in response to receiving a user selection of a minimumencryption level, the application monitoring server 110 may initiallycategorize; the monitoring stations of nearby properties based on adesignated encryption level. The encryption level designations may bebased on the specific encryption protocol used by the monitoringsystems, or other system configurations that are used to predict alikelihood of a security breach during data transmissions over acommunication pathway, in this regard, after receiving a user indicationof a minimum encryption level, when reconfiguring the monitor controlunit 140, the application monitoring station may select a subset ofmonitor control units of nearby properties that satisfy the encryptionlevel designation.

FIG. 7 illustrates examples of user-defined network settings andcorresponding signaling pathway configurations. As depicted, theuser-defined settings 710, 720, and 730 are examples of differentnetwork configurations that prioritize different transmission standards(e.g., cost-effectiveness and transmission latency). The configurations712, 722, and 732 depict examples of different configurations for asingle hybrid mesh network that is responsive to the user-definedsettings 710, 720, and 730, Although FIG. 7 depicts prioritization oftwo transmission standards, in other implementations, the system 100 mayalso provide the user with options to provide settings for other typesof transmission standards that can also impact data transmissions overthe direct communication pathways and the peer communication pathways ofthe hybrid mesh network. In some implementations, the monitor controlunits depicted in the configurations 712, 722, and 732 correspond to themonitor control units 510, 520, and 530.

The setting 710 reflects a preference for cost-effectiveness overtransmission latency. Under such a configuration, the applicationmonitoring station 110 adjusts the hybrid mesh network such thattransmission of monitoring system data yields the lowest cost for theuser of the monitor control 140 that originates the transmission signalto the application monitoring station 110. The clear preference forcost-effectiveness also results in a low preference for transmissionlatency as the hybrid mesh network may be configured to utilizeparticular peer communication pathways and direct communication pathwayswhere data transmission results in a lower overall cost. In the exampleof the configuration 712, the application monitoring station 110determines that this network configuration yields a lower overall costby rerouting the signal through multiple monitor control units insteadof transmitting the data through the direct communication pathway of theoriginating monitor control unit. This may be because the networkattributes of the originating monitor control unit may have limitedbandwidth, which makes transmission over its direct communicationpathway prohibitively expensive.

Alternatively, the setting 720 reflects a preference for reducingtransmission latency over cost-effectiveness. Under such aconfiguration, the application monitoring station 110 adjusts the hybridmesh network such that transmission of monitoring system data yields thelowest latency (or shortest transmission time) to transmit the data tothe application monitoring station 110 from the monitor control unit140. As described above, this also results in a low prioritization forcost-effectiveness since the transmission pathways within the hybridmesh network with the fastest transmissions are not likely to be themost cost-effective due to the network attributes required for hightransmission speeds (e.g., high upload and download speeds, highbandwidth availability, etc.). In the example of the configuration 722,the application monitoring station 110 determines that this networkconfiguration yields a higher transmission speed because it minimizesthe number of transmission pathways necessary to transmit monitoringsystem data to the application monitoring station.

Finally, the setting 730 reflects a preference for balancingcost-effectiveness and minimizing transmission latency to an acceptablelevel. Under such a configuration, the application monitoring station110 adjusts the hybrid mesh network by analyzing the differentalternative configurations that are possible and selecting theparticular configuration that yields a cost and transmission latencywithin a pre-determined bandwidth. In the example of the configuration732, the application monitoring station 110 initially identifies thenetwork characteristics of the various possible transmission pathwaysbetween the combinations of the direct communication pathways and thepeer communication pathways. Based on the identified networkcharacteristics, the application monitoring station 110 then selects aparticular network configuration that has an acceptable cost andtransmission latency.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of utilizing encrypted codes forencrypting data transmissions over a hybrid mesh network. For instance,the application monitoring station 110 may store a repository ofencryption codes 802 that includes a list of monitoring stations andcorresponding encryption codes provided to encryption monitoring stationdata. For example, the encryption codes may be used to protect datatransmissions over the monitor control units of nearby properties usingone or more peer communication pathways.

In the example depicted, the monitor control unit 820 encrypts storeddata 822 using an encryption code 804 provisioned by the applicationmonitoring station 110. In response to receiving an instruction totransmit the stored data 822 through the peer communication pathway ofthe monitor control unit 810, the monitor control unit 820 initiallyencrypts the stored data 820 using the encryption code 804. The monitorcontrol unit 820 then transmits the encrypted transmission 806A over apeer communication pathway to the monitor control unit 810.

In addition to transmitting encryption codes to monitor control units,the application monitoring station 110 may also transmit accessinstructions to the monitor control units of nearby properties. Forexample, as depicted, the application monitoring station 110 transmitsan access instruction to the monitor control unit 810, which enables themonitor control unit 810 to receive the encrypted transmission 806A andtransmit the relayed encryption transmission 806B to the applicationmonitoring station 110 to complete the data transmission over the peercommunication pathway.

Although FIG. 8 depicts one example of an access instruction (e.g., theaccess instruction 808), in some implementations, the applicationmonitoring station 110 may transmit different access instructions withvarying levels of access based on the network attributes of theoriginating monitor control unit (e.g., the monitor control unit 820 inthe FIG.) and the individual monitor control units that obtain encryptedtransmissions from the originating monitor control unit (e.g., theencrypted transmission 806A). In such implementations, the accessinstructions can be used to ensure sufficient security during datatransmissions.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of de-duplicating data transmissions overa hybrid mesh network. For instance, the monitor control unit 910 maytransmit a data transmission 902 to the application monitoring station110 through a direct transmission pathway, and also transmit a redundanttransmission 904A to the monitor control unit 920, when then transmitsthe redundant transmission 904B to the application monitoring station110 through a peer communication pathway. As described previously,although the specific transmission pathway may be selected based onconfiguring the monitor control unit 910, in some circumstances,duplicates of monitoring system data can be included in bothtransmission pathways.

As described previously with respect to FIG. 1, the applicationmonitoring station 110 stores the transmission record 114 for trackingincoming transmissions of monitoring system data from various monitorcontrol units. For instance, the records indicate the originatingmonitor control unit that generates the monitoring system data, thetransmission pathway within the hybrid mesh network used to transmit thedata to the application monitoring station 110, and the monitor controlunits of nearby properties that relay monitoring system data throughpeer communication pathways.

The transmission record 114 can also be used by the applicationmonitoring station to identify and delete duplicate data withindifferent data transmissions (e.g., data transmission 902 and redundanttransmission 904B) from the same originating monitor control unit (e.g.,the monitor control unit 910) using different transmission pathways. Inthis regard, the transmission record 114 can be used to more efficientlystore monitoring system data for a plurality of properties by generatingde-duplicated data 906.

In some implementations, generation of the de-duplicated data 906 by theapplication monitoring station 910 includes consolidating multiple datatransmissions by the same originating monitor control unit over aparticular period of time (e.g., weekly, monthly, etc.) for moreefficient storage of monitoring system data. For example, the datatransmissions specified by the transmission record 114 can initially bestored in a cache or temporary storage for the particular period oftime, and afterwards, the application monitoring station can utilize thetransmission record 114 to generate the de-duplicated data 906representing an aggregate data file that combines the data of each ofthe individual data transmissions. In this regard, the de-duplicationprocess can be used to cache data in a more efficient manner in additionto identifying duplicate instances of transmitted data.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example process 1000 of reconfiguring a signalingpathway configuration for a monitor control unit. Briefly, the process1000 may include receiving one or more transmission standards related todetection of events through a first communication pathway (1010), accessone or more transmission standards defined for transmission ofmonitoring system data (1020), evaluating the first communicationpathway against one or more transmission standards (1030), determiningthat the first communication does not presently satisfy the one or moretransmission standards (1040), identifying a second communication devicethrough a second communication pathway (1050), and reconfiguring thefirst communication device to transmit monitoring system data to thesecond communication device (1060).

In more detail, the process 1000 may include receiving one or moretransmission standards related to detection of events through a firstcommunication pathway (1010). For instance, the application monitoringstation 110 may receive one or more data transmissions related todetection of events at a property by the system 100 through a directcommunication pathway between the application monitoring station 110 andthe direct path transmission device 142 of the monitor control unit 140.

The process 1000 may include access one or more transmission standardsdefined for transmission of monitoring system data (1020). For instance,the application monitoring station 110 may access one or moretransmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring systemdata by the system 100 of the property. For example, the one or moretransmission standards can include a maximum cost of data transmission,user-defined privacy settings for data transmissions, or a maximumtransmission latency of data transmission.

The process 1000 may include evaluating the first communication pathwayagainst one or more transmission standards (1030). For instance, theapplication monitoring station 110 may evaluate the direct communicationpathway between the application monitoring station 110 and the directpath transmission device 142 of the monitor control unit 140 byestimating network attributes of the direct communication pathway andcomparing the estimated network attributes to the one or moretransmission standards for the property.

The process 1000 may include determining that the first communicationdoes not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards(1040). For instance, the application monitoring station 110 maydetermine that the network attributes associated with the directcommunication pathway does not satisfy the one or more transmissionstandards of the property. For example, as described previously, thiscan include if the data transmission is estimated to be prohibitivelycostly above the maximum transmission cost for the property, if theestimated latency is above the maximum transmission latency, or otherfactors. In one particular implementation, the data transmission mayindicate the presence of a life-critical alarm event at the property(e.g., a fire, carbon monoxide detection, security breach, etc.). Insuch an implementation, the application monitoring station 110 maydetermine that the direct communication pathway does not satisfy the oneor more transmission standards if the monitor control unit 140 ispresently unable to send the data transmission to the applicationmonitoring station 110 (e.g., if the monitor control unit 140 has lostnetwork connectivity).

The process 1000 may include identifying a second communication devicethrough a second communication pathway (1050). For instance, based onthe determination that the direct communication pathway does notpresently satisfy the one or more transmission standards, theapplication monitoring station 110 may identify the monitor control unit150, which is configured to exchange communications with the applicationmonitoring station 110 using a direct communication pathway between theapplication monitoring station 110 and the direct path transmissiondevice 152. In addition, as described previously, the applicationmonitoring station 110 may also determine that the peer communicationdevice 152 is capable of exchanging data communications with the peercommunication device 154 over the peer communication pathway 160.

The process 1000 may include reconfiguring the first communicationdevice to transmit monitoring system data to the second communicationdevice (1060). For instance, the application monitoring station 110 mayreconfigure the monitor control unit 140 to transmit monitoring systemdata detected by the system 100 at the property to the monitor controlunit 150 of a nearby property using the peer communication pathway 160.As described previously, the reconfiguration can be used to adjust thetransmission of monitoring system data from the direct communicationpathway between the application monitoring station 110 and the directpath transmission device 140 to the peer communication pathway 160between the peer communication devices 144 and 146, and then to thedirect communication pathway between the application monitoring station110 and the direct path transmission device 152. In this regard, themonitor control unit 140 can be reconfigured to alternatively transmitmonitoring system data to the application monitoring station 110 incircumstances where the direct communication pathway of the direct pathtransmission device 142 is presently unavailable.

The described systems, methods, and techniques may be implemented indigital electronic circuitry, computer hardware, firmware, software, orin combinations of these elements. Apparatus implementing thesetechniques can include appropriate input and output devices, a computerprocessor, and a computer program product tangibly embodied in amachine-readable storage device for execution by a programmableprocessor. A process implementing these techniques can be performed by aprogrammable processor executing a program of instructions to performdesired functions by operating on input data and generating appropriateoutput. The techniques can be implemented in one or more computerprograms that are executable on a programmable system including at leastone programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructionsfrom, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system,at least one input device, and at least one output device. Each computerprogram can be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-orientedprogramming language, or in assembly or machine language if desired; andin any case, the language can be a compiled or interpreted language.Suitable processors include, by way of example, both general and specialpurpose microprocessors. Generally, a processor will receiveinstructions and data from a read-only memory and/or a random accessmemory. Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer programinstructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory,including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such asErasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), Electrically ErasableProgrammable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), and flash memory devices;magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks;magneto-optical disks; and Compact Disc Read-Only Memory (CD-ROM). Anyof the foregoing can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, speciallydesigned application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs).

It will be understood that various modifications can be made. Forexample, other useful implementations could be achieved if steps of thedisclosed techniques were performed in a different order and/or ifcomponents in the disclosed systems were combined in a different mannerand/or replaced or supplemented by other components. Accordingly, otherimplementations are within the scope of the disclosure.

What is claimed is:
 1. An electronic system comprising: at least one processor; and at least one computer-readable medium coupled to the at least one processor having instructions stored therein which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to perform operations comprising: receiving, by a monitoring server and through a first communication pathway between the monitoring server and a first communication device associated with a first monitoring system of a first property, one or more data transmissions related to detection of events at the first property by the first monitoring system; measuring, by the monitoring server, one or more performance parameters of the one or more data transmissions, wherein the performance parameters comprise at least one of a signal latency, a data transfer rate, a measure of network integrity, or a measure of network reliability; accessing, by the monitoring server and from electronic storage, one or more transmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring system data by the first monitoring system of the first property; evaluating, by the monitoring server, the first communication pathway against the one or more transmission standards based on the one or more performance parameters of the one or more data transmissions; based on the evaluation of the first communication pathway against the one or more transmission standards, determining, by the monitoring server, that the first communication pathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards; based on the determination that the first communication pathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards, identifying a second communication device that is configured to exchange data transmissions with the monitoring server through a second communication pathway and that is configured to exchange data transmissions with the first communication device through a peer communication pathway, the second communication device being associated with a second monitoring system of a second property that is distinct from the first property; and reconfiguring, by the monitoring server, the first communication device to transmit monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property through the peer communication pathway to the second communication device associated with the second monitoring system of the second property, the second communication device being configured to relay monitoring system data received through the peer communication pathway to the monitoring server through the second communication pathway.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations comprise: generating, by the monitoring server, an encryption code for the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property; and transmitting, by the monitoring server, an instruction to the first communication device, to encrypt the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property based on the generated encrypted code; wherein the encrypted monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property is inaccessible to the second communication device associated with the second monitoring system of the second property when the second communication device relays the encrypted monitoring system data through the second communication pathway.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations comprise: receiving, by the monitoring server and from the first communication device, first monitoring system data transmitted through the first communication pathway; receiving, by the monitoring server and from the second communication device, second monitoring system data transmitted through the second communication pathway; identifying, by the monitoring server, a portion of first monitoring system data that includes data that is substantially similar to a portion of the second monitoring system data; processing, by the monitoring server, the first monitoring system data and the second monitoring system data to remove the respective portions of the first monitoring system data and the second monitoring system data that include data that is substantially similar; and storing, by monitoring server, the processed first monitoring system data and the processed second monitoring system data.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the first communication device is reconfigured to transmit monitoring system data to the second communication device based on a set of user-defined settings associated with the first monitoring system of the first property.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein determining that the first communication pathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards comprises at least one of: determining that a cost associated with transmitting the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property through the first communication pathway is greater than a threshold cost for transmission, and determining that a transmission latency associated with transmitting the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property through the first communication pathway is greater than a threshold transmission latency.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein identifying the second communication device that is configured to exchange data transmissions with the monitoring server through the second communication pathway comprises: identifying, by the monitoring system, a plurality of communication devices that are configured to exchange data transmissions with the monitoring server through a plurality of communication pathways, the plurality of communication devices being associated with a plurality of properties that are predetermined to be nearby the first property and configured to exchange data transmissions with the first communication device through a plurality of peer communication pathways; evaluating each of the plurality of peer communication pathways of the plurality of communication devices against the one or more transmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring system data by the first monitoring system of the first property; and selecting a particular communication device from among the plurality of communication devices based on evaluating each of the plurality of peer communication pathways of the plurality of communication devices against the one or more transmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring system data by the first monitoring system of the first property.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more data transmissions related to detection of events at the first property by the first monitoring system comprise alarm data indicating detection of a critical alarm event at the first property.
 8. A method performed by one or more computers, the method comprising: receiving, by a monitoring server and through a first communication pathway between the monitoring server and a first communication device associated with a first monitoring system of a first property, one or more data transmissions related to detection of events at the first property by the first monitoring system; measuring, by the monitoring server, one or more performance parameters of the one or more data transmissions, wherein the performance parameters comprise at least one of a signal latency, a data transfer rate, a measure of network integrity, or a measure of network reliability; accessing, by the monitoring server and from electronic storage, one or more transmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring system data by the first monitoring system of the first property; evaluating, by the monitoring server, the first communication pathway against the one or more transmission standards based on the one or more performance parameters of the one or more data transmissions; based on the evaluation of the first communication pathway against the one or more transmission standards, determining, by the monitoring server, that the first communication pathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards; based on the determination that the first communication pathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards, identifying a second communication device that is configured to exchange data transmissions with the monitoring server through a second communication pathway and that is configured to exchange data transmissions with the first communication device through a peer communication pathway, the second communication device being associated with a second monitoring system of a second property that is distinct from the first property; and reconfiguring, by the monitoring server, the first communication device to transmit monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property through the peer communication pathway to the second communication device associated with the second monitoring system of the second property, the second communication device being configured to relay monitoring system data received through the peer communication pathway to the monitoring server through the second communication pathway.
 9. The method of claim 8, comprising: generating, by the monitoring server, an encryption code for the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property; and transmitting, by the monitoring server, an instruction to the first communication device, to encrypt the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property based on the generated encrypted code; wherein the encrypted monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property is inaccessible to the second communication device associated with the second monitoring system of the second property when the second communication device relays the encrypted monitoring system data through the second communication pathway.
 10. The method of claim 8, comprising: receiving, by the monitoring server and from the first communication device, first monitoring system data transmitted through the first communication pathway; receiving, by the monitoring server and from the second communication device, second monitoring system data transmitted through the second communication pathway; identifying, by the monitoring server, a portion of first monitoring system data that includes data that is substantially similar to a portion of the second monitoring system data; processing, by the monitoring server, the first monitoring system data and the second monitoring system data to remove the respective portions of the first monitoring system data and the second monitoring system data that include data that is substantially similar; and storing, by monitoring server, the processed first monitoring system data and the processed second monitoring system data.
 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the first communication device is reconfigured to transmit monitoring system data to the second communication device based on a set of user-defined settings associated with the first monitoring system of the first property.
 12. The method of claim 8, wherein determining that the first communication pathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards comprises at least one of: determining that a cost associated with transmitting the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property through the first communication pathway is greater than a threshold cost for transmission, and determining that a transmission latency associated with transmitting the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property through the first communication pathway is greater than a threshold transmission latency.
 13. The method of claim 8, wherein identifying the second communication device that is configured to exchange data transmissions with the monitoring server through the second communication pathway comprises: identifying, by the monitoring system, a plurality of communication devices that are configured to exchange data transmissions with the monitoring server through a plurality of communication pathways, the plurality of communication devices being associated with a plurality of properties that are predetermined to be nearby the first property and configured to exchange data transmissions with the first communication device through a plurality of peer communication pathways; evaluating each of the plurality of peer communication pathways of the plurality of communication devices against the one or more transmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring system data by the first monitoring system of the first property; and selecting a particular communication device from among the plurality of communication devices based on evaluating each of the plurality of peer communication pathways of the plurality of communication devices against the one or more transmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring system data by the first monitoring system of the first property.
 14. The method of claim 8, wherein the one or more data transmissions related to detection of events at the first property by the first monitoring system comprise alarm data indicating detection of a critical alarm event at the first property.
 15. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more transmission standards comprise at least one of a maximum cost of data transmission, a user-defined privacy setting for data transmissions, or a maximum transmission latency of data transmission.
 16. The system of claim 1, wherein measuring, by the monitoring server, one or more performance parameters of the one or more data transmissions comprises measuring, by the monitoring server, a data hash of the one or more data transmissions; and wherein evaluating, by the monitoring server, the first communication pathway against the one or more transmission standards based on the one or more performance parameters of the one or more data transmissions comprises evaluating, by the monitoring server, the first communication pathway against the one or more transmission standards based on comparing the data hash of the one or more data transmissions to a data hash of an original signal.
 17. The system of claim 1, wherein measuring, by the monitoring server, one or more performance parameters of the one or more data transmissions comprises measuring, by the monitoring server, a cyclic redundancy check of the one or more data transmissions; and wherein determining, by the monitoring server, that the first communication pathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards comprises determining that the cyclic redundancy check does not satisfy the one or more transmission standards.
 18. The system of claim 1, wherein: measuring, by the monitoring server, one or more performance parameters of the one or more data transmissions comprises measuring, by the monitoring server, a signal latency; accessing, by the monitoring server and from electronic storage, one or more transmission standards defined for transmission of monitoring system data by the first monitoring system of the first property comprises accessing, by the monitoring server and from electronic storage, a threshold latency value; and determining, by the monitoring server, that the first communication pathway does not presently satisfy the one or more transmission standards comprises determining, by the monitoring server, that the signal latency does not satisfy the threshold latency value.
 19. The system of claim 2, wherein generating, by the monitoring server, an encryption code for the monitoring system data detected by the first monitoring system at the first property comprises generating, by the monitoring server, an encryption code based on a minimum encryption level designated by a user of the first monitoring system at the first property.
 20. The system of claim 4, wherein the set of user-defined settings associated with the first monitoring system of the first property comprise a prioritization of two or more transmission standards. 